Proof · Verified outcomes

The opening position was high. Here is what we defended.

Every case below is anonymized to a sector and a rough size to protect client terms. Each figure is verified against the signed outcome. We defend end customers in Microsoft license audits and hosters in SPLA audits, and we never take vendor money.

95 to 100%
Of penalty exposure defended
$500M+
Microsoft exposure defended
300+
Microsoft and SPLA audits
20+
Years combined
Selected cases

Outcomes by track

SPLA hoster · Gainshare

A European cloud hoster cut a SPLA penalty by most of its value

A Big Four auditor reconstructed 36 months of monthly positions and proposed an uplift near the top of the range. We rebuilt the SAL base from operations data, completed customer mapping, and corrected product version mapping. The corrected base cut the back fee and the uplift was negotiated to the floor.

96%
Penalty exposure defended
$0
Retainer, gainshare
End customer · Formal audit

A Fortune 500 insurer reversed an inflated Effective License Position

The auditor read Microsoft telemetry from Azure and Microsoft 365 as unlicensed deployment. We ran our own assessment first, then reconciled entitlement against real use and proved that most flagged installs were already covered. The reconciled position fell well under the 5 percent clause.

98%
Of proposed shortfall defended
Under 5%
Final unlicensed use
End customer · EA true up

A global manufacturer right sized an EA true up before signing

The reseller presented a true up that counted every assigned license as consumed. We audited actual usage across the estate, removed dormant and double counted seats, and rebalanced the E3 and E5 mix to match real need before the true up was submitted.

31%
True up reduced, indicative
Pre signing
Caught before submission
SPLA hoster · Fixed Fee

A managed service provider closed a SPLA audit with records gaps

Several months of authentication logs were missing. Rather than concede the auditor's assumed counts, we reconstructed defensible monthly figures from billing and provisioning records, documented multi tenant boundaries, and separated the non negotiable back fee from the negotiable uplift.

93%
Of proposed uplift defended
36 mo
Lookback reconstructed
End customer · Self verification

A healthcare system controlled a self verification on its own timeline

A self verification is a contractual demand the customer cannot decline, but the timeline and the evidence are open to discipline. We set the response schedule, assembled the entitlement record, and presented a clean position before Microsoft applied its own counting methodology.

100%
Penalty exposure defended
$0
Additional licenses owed
End customer · SAM engagement

A logistics group declined a SAM review and assessed itself first

The account team presented a SAM engagement as a free optimization. We helped the customer decline the initial review, run an independent internal assessment, and respond from a controlled position. No gap was handed to the vendor before it was understood internally.

Controlled
Engagement on buyer terms
0
Findings conceded early

Figures are verified against the signed outcome and anonymized to protect client terms. Any figure marked indicative reflects a representative range, not a single client.

Your audit can read the same way. Defended.

Fixed Fee from $18,000 or Gainshare on verified savings. Both backed by our guarantee: we reduce your exposure or we reimburse our service fee.

Get a Quote

Prefer to talk first? Use the same form and ask to Book a Strategy Call.

The Audit Brief

Weekly intelligence on Microsoft and SPLA audit moves and the buyer side defenses that work.

Get a Quote · Book a Strategy Call · The Audit Brief · About · Pricing · Blog · Contact · Privacy · Terms · New York · London Not affiliated with Microsoft Corporation. Independent buyer side advisory only.