Remediation is the point where an audit forces a purchase. Handled as a penalty, it is paid at the worst terms. Handled as a negotiation, it becomes the leverage for a better agreement.
Once a finding is settled in principle, you have to close the gap, and closing it means buying licenses or subscriptions. That moment is usually framed as paying a penalty, which puts you in the weakest possible posture. It is more useful to see it as what it is, a purchase you are about to make, and any purchase is a negotiation.
The shift matters because Microsoft wants the remediation to convert into a forward commitment. That want is leverage you can use, if you recognize it before you sign.
A remediation is rarely just the disputed quantity at 125 percent of price. It is bundled with a forward looking commitment, a renewal, or a move to a cloud subscription that Microsoft would prefer you make anyway. Each of those carries value to Microsoft, and value to Microsoft is a lever for you. The skill is to separate what you genuinely need to acquire from what is being attached to the deal.
Pay only at list for the bare gap and you have left the leverage on the table. Trade the forward commitment Microsoft wants for better terms on what you must buy, and remediation starts to look like procurement rather than punishment.
Order matters. Settle the disputed quantity first, using a rebuilt and defended position, so the number you are remediating is the right number rather than the opening claim. Only then discuss how to buy it, and bring the renewal or cloud move into the same conversation deliberately. If Microsoft wants the forward commitment, it should pay for it in the terms on your remediation.
Done in this order, the remediation and the next agreement are negotiated together, which is almost always cheaper than settling the penalty and renewing separately.
| Approach | Disputed gap | Forward terms |
|---|---|---|
| Penalty paid at list | Full claim at 125 percent | Standard renewal |
| Deal negotiated | Reduced verified quantity | Improved renewal terms |
The same finding produces two very different outcomes. The figures depend on your estate, but the structural advantage of negotiating the close is consistent.
Throughout remediation the principle holds that the opening position is built to be high and that an Effective License Position is negotiated after the report. The goal is not just a discount but the right quantity bought on the right terms, with the 5 percent clause and its 125 percent pricing kept firmly in mind.
Our own engagement carries no downside. If our defense does not reduce your exposure, we reimburse our service fee in full.
If you are heading into remediation, the close is where the last and largest savings sit. We engage on a Fixed Fee from $18,000 or on Gainshare, a share of verified savings or avoided penalty with zero retainer and no risk to you, and we sit on your side of the table without ever taking vendor money.
Read the survival guide below, then bring us the finding and your renewal calendar so we can negotiate them together.
If you want a second set of eyes first, our Microsoft audit defense team manages every exchange with the auditor on your behalf.
Turn the purchase you must make into a better agreement.
Download guideWeekly intelligence on Microsoft and SPLA audit moves and the buyer side defenses that work.